|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aeon Amadi
Maverick Conflict Solutions
1003
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 09:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
EDITORIAL NOTE: My math was wrong and I have changed the post accordingly - please see bottom of post for further information.
This build the AV/Tank balance is just ridiculous. Here's why.
Here's the stacking penalties on using more than one Shield Resistance on an HAV.
-25% 1 Shield Resist -46.75% 2 Shield Resists -61% 3 Shield Resists -68% 4 Shield Resists -82% 4 Shield Resists + Damage Control
Now, for the sake of argument, we're going to assume that a Sagaris with two resistances, a shield extender, a damage control, and a booster.
6000 (approximately) HP with 60.75% resistance.
Now we'll pit it against an Officer Forge Gun, which does 1080 damage - base - and with Weaponry 5 and Proficiency 3 would be an 24% increase to a grand total of 1340.
Now, we're going to take the resistances and apply it to our forge gun, which now makes it at 536.
6,000 divided by 536 = 11.19, approximately. This is about two magazines from your Officer Forge Gun.
This means that with two (officer) forge gunners firing at the same Tank, taking into account charge up times, it would take 10 Seconds for both gunners to exhaust their magazines and theoretically deplete the tank's shields. Round about's 20, for one gunner. In this time frame the tank has already disengaged the battle and has retreated to an area that it can use it's booster - all the while using a large array of weaponry to fire back at it's opponents.
Whatever happened in this build screwed over any balance there ever was between vehicles and Anti-Vehicle builds.
To counter the argument that Movement Nullifiers will "fix everything", you're very wrong. Movement Nullifiers will help but they won't solve the issue at hand - as this math is directed for -ONE TANK- and I have seen as many as five in a single match.
I'm curious as to what CCP was even thinking when they came out with the AV "hotfix" in the first place, to be honest. Reducing the speed on the tanks isn't the problem - it's their absolutely ridiculous invulnerability to conventional methods.
EDITORIAL NOTE: I know that the Officer Forge Gun has 6 rounds in the mag - but a Proto Forge Gun does about the same damage so it's a moot point.
FURTHER EDITORIAL NOTE: I realized that 804 was the 60% of the damage from the forge gun - that number was what was being removed from the equation, and replaced it with the 40% left over -after- the resistances were taken into account. |
Aeon Amadi
Maverick Conflict Solutions
1003
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 09:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Sha Kharn Clone wrote:Lol you just wait dude all the tank srubs are gona hate this Also Why pick such an awful fit as an example? Well even this bad fit shows its overpowered so lolz. Also you might wana factor in shield regen because that adds up more than you might think. Anyway thanks for takign the time to put this together and congrats on not making any tank friends today lolz Edit: lol didnt even see you were using an officer forge gun lol nice.
I used a Surya in the last build - don't know jack of **** about tanks. Either way, I know some idiot is going to say "Prototype Breach Forge Gun" but every Forge Gunner user knows that's a got damn death sentence what with not being able to move. |
Aeon Amadi
Maverick Conflict Solutions
1003
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 09:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
Shadows Maker wrote:in b4 tank fanboys flame 1+ for the explanation maybe this time they will admit tanks are OP
As I said in Previous post, I used a Surya with a Railgun last build and I learned very quickly to aim for the Bolas instead of the tank - as I say to the guys in TCD (my corp), "The best way to treat a sunburn is to not get one in the first place". |
Aeon Amadi
Maverick Conflict Solutions
1003
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 10:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
Buzzwords wrote:you math is off.
a 60% damage reduction leaves the forge gun with 40% of it's damage, or: 1340X.4=536.
you multiplied by .6, or: 1340X.6=804 which would represent a 40% damage reduction.
so in reality it's much much worse.
Edited. Thank you very much for noticing that. I got the numbers mixed up it seems. |
Aeon Amadi
Maverick Conflict Solutions
1003
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 10:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote:That's why they're going to buff AV and Forgeguns on the next build. I believe 25% more.
Which would then make the damage of the Forge Gun 1600, minus 60% resists makes it 960.
6000 divided by 960 = 6.25 rounds, effectively 14 seconds of charge/fire time with an -officer- forge gun.
A little better but not by much, especially with the movement penalties involved - the Titan dropsuit will only make that worse. |
Aeon Amadi
Maverick Conflict Solutions
1003
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 10:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tyas Borg wrote:So your complaining that two guys can't take out a 3 man tank which probably costs more than their fits combined and multiplied by at least 3.....
People seem obsessed with this idea that 1-2 guys should insta pop a tank. You even say yourself that 2 forge gunners would make a tank run. I'd go as far to say that one can.
The point here is that the tank HAS to move and your denying it whatever it was doing. The fact it's not dead isn't the issue, the AV has done it's job and the tank is gone. Besides the fact that if the tank didn't run, then it'd be dead so AV is fine?, no?.
I've not used the Forge gun this build, but I'm on the receiving end of it a lot and to me it does it's job. If I hear the thing fire up I run, if I don't I'm as good as dead and if not I have to retreat out of the fight to recover.
I have however used the swarm launcher and anybody saying tanks are OP HASN'T specced into swarms. I can kill Marauders and make them run like girls on my own with lvl 2 Swarms... Yeah AV is really broken...not. How about people actually spec into countering it?.
I've seen organised groups of 4 devastate a tank, just because they can't be solo'd doesn't mean they're OP.
Personally the only true counter to a tank should be a tank or some kind of artillery/tank killer vehicle.
I will admit that there's an issue with how many tanks we see in a single match however, but this could all be eliminated through the use of War Points cost to deploy or just limiting the amount of tanks.
Can we make it so that 2 frigates can pop a titan in EvE CCP?, this is obviously what the Dust player base wants as far as vehicles go.
Simply buffing AV is not the answer. There's tonnes of systems that could be deployed to balance them, simply crying nerf or buff is total crap imo.
For example how about making vehicle weapons do 75% AV damage and 25% AI damage?, in fact no lets go with crying over numbers and shout buff AV waaahhhhh!!111!
A proto forge gun costs hundreds of thousands of isk and there's not much in the way of being absolutely destroyed just trying to use the damned thing. Take into account damage modifiers (that are worth a damn) adding onto that price, plus the suit cost, and that -one- forge gunner costs about a fourth or third of what you're paying for the tank.
Even then, this math is with an OFFICER Forge Gun which you can't get on the market. It shouldn't take an entire third of the team to work on -ONE- tank, let alone the entire enemy team using them.
Running is one thing but these Tank Drivers have nothing to fear when they can take that many rounds of AV weaponry when all it takes is a single Railgun round - hell, even a single round from the Missile Launcher is enough to **** up a Heavy with the Camera Jerk throwing the aim off.
You're assuming the -BEST- of situations when clearly that will only ever happen rarely, you're being way too optimistic about this.
EVEN THEN you're not taking into account the hordes of organized infantry that can turn a Forge Gunner into swiss cheese before he even considers going toe-to-toe with a Tank.
Try again. |
Aeon Amadi
Maverick Conflict Solutions
1003
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 12:13:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tyas Borg wrote:So let me get this straight. Your basing all this on the fact a salvage only weapon can't kill a proto Tank?. As far as I'm aware that doesn't mean it's the best, just a lot rarer and a greater loss to lose one.
How about picking something readily available so it doesn't look one sided as hell. Sure if you lose something rare your gonna rage more.
I still stand by my argument about Swarms, you obviously haven't tried it.
I can make a loadout using the Assault 2 suit with lvl 2 swarms and damage modifiers and it eats marauders. Doesn't cost hardly anything per spawn. The cost argument on the forge is still valid, my tank costs 2-3 mill isk. That means those two guys have 3-4 lives to attack me, yet I have one?. Yeah that's really fair and balanced that is...
Seriously, it sounds more like your complaining about heavy's/forge's being broken than Tanks, (which to be fair I think they are).
Plus I'd like to point out that your basing your "facts" on the descriptions given to us on the items. I know for a fact that CCP has dropped a ******* on a fair few of the stats. AV grenades, for example, read 200 odd damage now and did even back in last patch where they did like 1-2k....
Until all CCP's gameplay systems and correct stats are in place, posts like this thread are totally irrelevant and nothing more than whines tbh. NONE of us know what's being planned and raging that something is OP now is pointless.
I'll quite confidently say that I'm one of the better HAV drivers out there and I have to run, a lot. We are not invincible, far from it. The problem comes when 90% of the people your playing are total idiots, refuse to work together or adapt to a situation.
On the US servers they don't even attempt to deal with tanks and on the EU servers at least they shoot at you with something other than their AR, sometimes.
Are you high?
The Officer Forge Gun is comparable to a Prototype - it does -MORE- damage than the Prototype and doesn't come with the added bit of - yanno -being completely immovable.
You still haven't acknowledged the fact that we're talking about more than one tank here, you're just blindly defending them to death by trying to strawman the argument so it's easier for you to defeat by searching for various outs like Swarm Launchers and picking out that I used a salvage only weapon - the best by many aspects not just by damage but having HALF the charge up time as it's paid for variant as your defense.
You're a troll - and until you come up with something valid to support your bullshit argument I'm fairly sure myself and everyone here will just ignore you from this point forward because you're not contributing to either side, you're throwing out meaningless forms that aren't even remotely related so that you can keep your insanely difficult to destroy tank.
Even under the best of circumstances you might lose that -one- tank but the ISK you'll gain from having it will -more- than cover all the matches you haven't lost the damned thing when there are only three effective counters to it: Tank, Forge Guns, Swarm Launchers - where as the Forge Gunners/Swarm Launchers can get killed by freaking -EVERYTHING- in this game. Hell, a ill-timed vehicle drop can kill a fully proto-outfitted soldier and you're bitching because "Tanks should be over-powered".
I call absolute bullshit - yes, Tanks should be over-powered, but constructively so. Not frakking invulnerable, numerous, and easy to replace as they are. Sure the 1.2 million price tag sucks but considering how ******* difficult they are to kill it's not like you're going to lose it -every- round. Speaking from experience, tanks in real-life are susceptible to all sorts of means of being destroyed. A pitfall with RPG rounds pointed straight up killed an M1 Abrams once, a Bridge collapse drowned another's crew - yet because this is a game I can't do these things.
Find another thread to spread your propaganda.
|
Aeon Amadi
Maverick Conflict Solutions
1003
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 12:15:00 -
[8] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Sha Kharn Clone wrote:You say this but I felt unstoppable befor the AV nerf. I had 2 Sagaris' for the first Precursor deployment, and as soon as I looked over their new stats, I never even used them. First match I went into featured 3 of them dying within 5 minutes to AV grenades. Another important thing to note is that they were dying to AV grenades and Swarms used IN A GROUP. Always squad up, and always surround/trap. Once they re-buff AV and put in the Stasis Webifier mines, the current stats on HAVs are going to make operating them suicidal.
Pre-"hotfix" which nerfed AV grenade damage by 25%, Forge Gun damage by 25%, and Swarm Launcher lock-on range to 400m.
Webifier mines aren't going to do jack of **** when there's five tanks on the field dude. I mentioned this in my original post and you seemed to have completely ignored that fact - but it's whatever, I don't expect Precursor Tank Drivers to be logical. |
Aeon Amadi
Maverick Conflict Solutions
1003
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 14:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
Raynor Ragna wrote:If two guys can't do it in a timely manner, bring three or four. Why try to barely kill a tank when you can bend the mofo over.
Anytime the enemy deploys a tank, a good portion of your team should go to the nearly resupply and get into an AV fit and kill it dead.. Then switch back.
You realize tanks can drive faster than scouts (with kinetic catalyzers no less) can sprint? |
|
|
|